editor decision started nature rejection

Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. 1124. It is up to the editor whether to accept or reject. Authors are provided the opportunity to opt out of this scheme at the completion of the peer review process, before the paper is accepted. Space in Nature is extremely limited, and so format requirements must be strictly observed, as advised by the editor handling the submission, and detailed in the manuscript formatting guide. In light of such uncertainty, the threshold for reversing a decision must be set well above the level of 'noise' in the process: otherwise, decisions would simply go back and forth endlessly in a kind of Brownian motion. Currently working as an Assistant Editor for the Discover Journals under Springer Nature. [CDATA[// > Editor rejected manuscript claiming it is similar to a not-yet-published manuscript (that I haven't seen). Although optional, the cover letter is an excellent opportunity to briefly discuss the importance of the submitted work and why it is appropriate for the journal. Do the revisions and resubmit. 172.104.52.81 Thanks! Editor Decision When making a decision, we expect that the academic editor checks the following: The suitability of selected reviewers; Adequacy of reviewer comments and author response; Overall scientific quality of the paper. As opposed to an editor, a peer reviewer advises the researcher of how he would have conducted his research, and what research methods would have made a difference. . How long should we wait if the current status of the manuscript is "Decision Started"? That's it . If the authors feel that they have a strong scientific case for reconsideration (if the referees have missed the point of the paper, for example) they can appeal the decision in writing. Special care is given to papers whose authors native language is not English, and special attention is given to summary paragraphs. Although we hope that the peer review files will provide a detailed and useful view into our peer review process, it is important to note that these files will not contain all the information considered in the editorial decision making process, such as the discussions between editors, editorial decision letters, or any confidential comments made by reviewers or authors to the editors. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. Yet, little is known about how these infrastructures support, stabilize, transform or change existing editorial practices. Calm down, and wait a few days before starting your response, then re-read the version of the paper that you actually submitted. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. The categories includeroughly in order of persuasivenessnew data or analysis, factual errors by referees or editors, disagreement with technical criticisms, evidence of referee bias, procedural concerns and disputes over novelty or significance. At times, they may ask you to revise and resubmit the manuscript. This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. Its been more than 2 months since I submitted my manuscript to a journal. 2. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked. [CDATA[> "Advice please! According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, Awaiting AE recommendation status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AEs decision for acceptance is pending. . Asked by megha m To obtain In a perfect world, we would consult with dozens of experts, who would spend many hours considering every point in the manuscript. //--> ensure that the terminology and notation conform to. Finally, despite persistent beliefs to the contrary, we do not base our decisions on the reputations of the authors or their friends, and so we do not respond favorably to 'celebrity endorsements' or statements about authors' previous track records. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. All peer-reviewed content will carry an anonymous statement of peer reviewer acknowledgement, and for those reviewers who give their consent, we will publish their names alongside the published article. If both reviewers give negative recommendations, it is much less likely for the editor to accept a paper. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Production We do our best to insure a fair and consistent process for all authors, but procedural concerns must be balanced against our obligation to maintain, and if possible raise, the journal's overall standards. . This decision will then be validated by the Editor-in-Chief. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. I submitted a MS to a Nature-Branded Journal on 9/10 and today the status changed to "Editor Decision Started". Manuscripts should be submitted via our online manuscript submission system. This, in turn, means that the status Awaiting decision refers to the decision that the editor will take about whether your paper will be sent for peer review or desk rejected. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Answer (1 of 7): Most submissions are rejected by editors without review, and this should be fast - perhaps, two weeks (?). [CDATA[// >